Taylor County, WI

Home values #

Typical home $229,101 (Sep 2026), +8.4% over one year, +16.0% over five

• 49th pct · 1,550th of 3,063 US counties · median $230,451
• 15th pct · 61st of 72 Wisconsin counties · median $298,510

Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), typical value of homes in the 35th to 65th percentile, smoothed and seasonally adjusted; a model estimate of value, not a sale price. Data through Zillow Research.

Rents #

Zillow publishes no rent index for this area (ZORI covers about 1,400 counties)

• US counties: not published this period
• Wisconsin counties: not published this period

Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI), smoothed, all homes and multifamily; price-to-rent = typical home / (typical rent × 12).

What the typical home costs to carry #

Principal and interest of $1,269 a month on $229,101 at 7.40%, against an average weekly wage worth $4,221 a month: 30.1% of one job’s pay.

• payment = P·r / (1 − (1+r)^−n), P = $229,101 × 80% = $183,280, r = 7.40%/12 (Freddie Mac PMMS via FRED, 2026-10-15), n = 360 → $1,269/mo principal and interest
• wage share = payment / (avg weekly wage $974 × 52 / 12 = $4,221) = 30% of one average job's pay (BLS QCEW 2026 Q1, all covered jobs)
• years of wages = $229,101 / ($974 × 52) = 4.5

The wage is one covered job’s average, not a household’s income, so this is the share of a single paycheque and not a mortgage underwriting ratio.

Estimate. Principal and interest on the typical home with 20% down over 30 years at this week's Freddie Mac average rate; compared with the average weekly wage of all jobs covered by unemployment insurance in the area (BLS QCEW), which is pay per job, not household income.

Jobs & wages #

7,668 jobs at 551 employers (2026 Q1); -0.9% jobs and +2.1% average weekly wage over the year

• 48th pct · 1,666th of 3,221 US counties · median 8,232
• 33rd pct · 48th of 72 Wisconsin counties · median 15,405

BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, all ownerships, total covered employment in the quarter's third month; over-the-year changes as published. Suppressed cells stay blank.

Drought #

D2 severe drought

Sites found: 5, searched within 0 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 0 km away are not.

US Drought Monitor current week; the highest class of any polygon containing the point.

Reservoirs #

No reservoir gauges within 150 km (or the camera is above the gauge altitude)

Sites found: 0, searched within 150 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 150 km away are not.

Σ(capacity × percent full) / Σ capacity over TWDB reservoirs within 150 km. Texas only; elsewhere USGS reservoir elevation/storage is listed without a capacity to normalise by.

Stream gauges #

21 gauges · 0 flooding · 0 with quality panels · 8 stale

Sites found: 21, searched within 75 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 75 km away are not.

USGS latest readings screened against EPA freshwater criteria (DO ≥ 5 mg/L, pH 6.5–9, conductance, turbidity, temperature); NWS flood categories where a NWPS gauge is co-located.

Groundwater #

7 wells in 0 named aquifers:

Sites found: 7, searched within 75 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 75 km away are not.

USGS latest daily water levels. A single latest reading says where the table is, not which way it is moving; select a well for its 365-day trace.

Water stress #

high (0.50)

Σ wᵢ·termᵢ / Σ wᵢ = 0.35×0.50 / 0.35

Banks & federal dollars #

$660.4 m in deposits at 6 offices of 5 banks (SOD June 2026); HHI 2,334, highly concentrated. $120.8 m federal obligations in FY2026 (direct payments $121.0 m, contracts $316,524), $15,758 per covered job

Deposit concentration is 2,334 across 5 banks, which the 1995 Department of Justice bank merger screen calls highly concentrated.

HHI = Σ (share %)² over 5 banks with deposits in the county = 30.8² + 26.2² + 19.0² + … (2 more) = 2,334

FDIC Summary of Deposits: deposits at every insured office as of June 30, annual; HHI is the sum of squared county deposit shares (DOJ 1995 bank merger screen: 1000 / 1800). USAspending: obligations by place of performance for the latest complete federal fiscal year (Oct 1 to Sep 30), what agencies committed, not what they paid out; recipients are legal entities. Per-job divides obligations by BLS QCEW covered employment.

Federal obligations #

USAspending place-of-performance obligations for FY2026, by awarding agency.

That is $15,758 per covered job, against 7,668 jobs in the 2026 Q1 QCEW quarter.

per job = FY2026 obligations $120.8 m / 7,668 covered jobs (BLS QCEW 2026 Q1, all ownerships) = $15,758

USAspending obligations are recorded where the work is performed, so a prime award performed here is counted here even when the recipient is headquartered elsewhere. Recipients are legal entities, never people.

National context, not this county #

These are United States, single-gauge, single-state and port series. None of them is keyed to this county.

The indicator registry has no county-keyed series and no geographic selection: every entry is national, a named gauge, a single state or a port. They are here as the backdrop the county's own numbers move against, and they are never this county's readings.

What changed #

Taylor County, WI: 8 findings, 3 at a watch level and 5 noted

1. watchTaylor County, WI's covered employment is -0.9% against a year earlier, a watch level here: covered employment below the same quarter a year earlier (BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change, as published; not an official level). The previous published period is not in this table, so this is a standing level rather than a change.

   Period 2026 Q1.
   Show the arithmetic

   • test: jobs.yoy.emp = -0.9 < 0

   BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change, as published; not an official level

2. watchTaylor County, WI's years of wages of 4.5 scores 56 on the 0-to-100 scale across US counties but 15 across Wisconsin counties, a gap of 41 points.

   Period 2026-09.
   Show the arithmetic

   • 41 = |56 across US counties - 15 across Wisconsin counties|
   • typical home value / (average weekly wage × 52); one average covered job, not a household

   position among the entities that published this metric this period; not an official level

3. watchTaylor County, WI's typical home value of $229,101 scores 49 on the 0-to-100 scale across US counties but 15 across Wisconsin counties, a gap of 34 points.

   Period 2026-09.
   Show the arithmetic

   • 34 = |49 across US counties - 15 across Wisconsin counties|

   position among the entities that published this metric this period; not an official level

4. noteTaylor County, WI's average weekly wage was 2.1% higher than the same quarter a year earlier in 2026 Q1, on BLS QCEW's published over-the-year change.

   Period 2026 Q1.
   Show the arithmetic

   • +2.1 % = BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change for 2026 Q1, as published
   • the newest QCEW file carries no year-earlier level, so no move from one level to another is printed

   BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change, as published

5. noteTaylor County, WI's covered employment was 0.9% lower than the same quarter a year earlier in 2026 Q1, on BLS QCEW's published over-the-year change.

   Period 2026 Q1.
   Show the arithmetic

   • -0.9 % = BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change for 2026 Q1, as published
   • the newest QCEW file carries no year-earlier level, so no move from one level to another is printed

   BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change, as published

Read all 8 findings in the full brief

Every finding is produced by a fixed rule table and a fixed sentence for each rule. Nothing here is generated prose.